Archive for the ‘Site News’ Category

Uwe Boll’s Rampage

When I first added this movie to my Netflix queue, I didn’t know it was directed by Uwe Boll; once I saw his name attached to it, however, I instantly decided to watch it.  Funny how that happens: you despise a particular director so much and yet feel compelled to watch what you already know is going to be horrendous, just to see how horrendous it’s going to be.  To a large extent, his oeuvre is a textbook on how not to make movies.  What makes him different from that other great of not-great cinema, Ed Wood, is that Wood had an earnestness that is not entirely present in Boll’s work.  That’s not to say that Boll doesn’t probably think he’s great (if he truly believes the things he says in his commentaries), it’s that there is a well-publicized profit motive to Boll’s movies.  To a large extent, he’s in it for the money.

Much like Ed Wood, however, there is a similar lack of understanding of the use of film techniques, story-telling, and other fundamentals.  Every now-and-then, Boll manages to get a scene right (although it’s probably dubious who’s actually responsible for the minor successes).  In the latest Greatest Movie Ever Podcast on Boll’s Far Cry, Paul Chapman and Jeff “Rich Lather” Tatarek mention this trend in Boll’s later movies.  Rampage follows this trend.  Not all of the movie is horrible, and in some cases one can see what Boll is trying to do.  The end result, however, still fails to achieve anything close to a deep, meaningful cinematic experience.  In some cases, that wouldn’t be that much of a problem; were Rampage just supposed to be a dumb action movie, one could hardly criticize it for failing.  But Rampage is full of Boll’s attempts to do something more meaningful, and that is its primary failing.

Of course, no Boll movie would be complete if it didn’t fail at the very basics, and for Rampage that happens at the very beginning.  Much of the first 40 minutes of the movie consists of flash-forwards.  In fact, one of the first scenes in the movie is one of the last.  Boll appears to be trying to be clever, but the scenes are presented with no context, nothing to connect them to what’s going on in the actual scene.  The most obvious of these is Bill, our rampager, shirtless, pouring gasoline into a  barrel, and setting it on fire.  We’re supposed to assume that it has some sort of importance given its prominence at the beginning of the film, but in the end it’s just a bit of plot.  It has the appearance of significance, but no real symbolic meaning.  In a similar way, interspersed with the flash-forwards are clips of Bill in front of a white background, and while these are explained later in the film, that explanation becomes one of its major problems.

Another “filmic” technique that Boll gets wrong is the random clips of news and talk show audio at different points in the film.  The suggestion is that Bill is listening to these while doing something else (such as hitting a punching bag, driving, or getting ready for his rampage).  Just like with the previous clips, you get the idea that Boll is using this for a purpose (in this case he’s building up his case for Bill’s rampage, a kind of audible explanation), but there are a couple problems with this.  First, the clips are random and general.  At no point does Boll relate these specifically to Bill’s character.  Second, they invite the question “Who’s changing the channel?”  If no one’s changing the channel, if we accept that this is an artistic technique, then they are there for the audience.  But that takes us back to the first point, and the weakness of the film’s support for its theme.

The key to a film like this is the buildup; we have to emotionally connect to both the main character and his situation.  The obvious comparison for this movie is Falling Down starring Michael Douglas, and the parallels are not just in general situation, although that is a good place to start.  The emotional connection fails as soon as characters begin speaking.  The dialog is incredibly stilted and flat; this might be appropriate for our main character, but his parents are the worst offender.  My first thought was that they must be badly improvising, and it appears that is basically what happened; the Netflix description mentions that much of the dialog was improvised.  Thus, an experienced actor like Matt Frewer (Bill’s dad; not a phenomenal actor, but by no means bad) comes off looking like he doesn’t know where the scene is going.  Bill’s mom, played by Lynda Boyd (and actress I’m not familiar with, but who has a large enough filmography to make me think she’s normally not horrible) is even worse; she stumbles through lines, each sounding like she’s just thought of the words but not how to say them.  Improvisation is about responding and reacting to others, and I never got the feeling that the actors were actually in dialog with each other; instead, as often happens with bad or inexperienced improvisers, they sound like they’re talking at each other. The end result of this is that at no point are we emotionally invested in the situation; neither in Bill, nor his parents, nor his friend Evan, no one carries any emotional weight, and thus the events of the film don’t really matter.

So, what about his situation?  Surely some string of events, even a string of minor-but-concentrated frustrations that represent the ever-present oppression of modern society, conspire to turn our boy into a mass murderer?  Nope, nothing like that at all.  Basically, our boy is a closet Malthusian (there’s too many people in his small, uncrowded town with acres of undeveloped forest teeming with no one but paintball players), his parents are bugging him about going to college or some sort of trade school, and his boss wants him to work for his paycheck.  That’s pretty much it.  He has a bit of trouble in a coffee shop (his macchiato wasn’t foamy enough)and in a blindingly obvious nod to Falling Down, a fast-food worker inexplicably spills food on him.  Apart from his boxing (which he does in the morning while mom bugs him about breakfast; I mean, how dare she make breakfast for him and expect him to eat it while it’s hot?!) we see very little frustration, very little pushing him over the edge.

In fact, he’s already over-the-edge.  The whole rampage has been carefully planned; he’s getting mysterious packages sent to his friend’s house as a not-so-subtle frame-up, and working on a remote-controlled van (one of the only interesting plot points).  So in the end, all the things we see in the film are just there rather than directly contributing to his decision to murder innocent people.

The scene in the “Chicken Den” is really the worst offender here because it hearkens back to Falling Down.  Michael Douglas’s frustration at the arbitrariness of the 10:30 cut-off time for breakfast and the poor quality of the lunch he is able to purchase is a classic.  Instead, we get some hamfisted commentary in the vein of “This is what American’s eat.”  I think the actor playing Evan attempted to parallel Falling Down further by commenting on the quality of his salad, but this may be an example of improvisation failing.  Furthermore, after rewatching the scene I still can’t figure out what the cashier was trying to do.  She’ walks up, mumbles something, and tries to close the container Bill is eating from.  It’s like Boll told her to knock over the drinks on the table, but didn’t given her anything to do to facilitate that, and she couldn’t think of a valid reason to go over there (since rarely does a fast-food worker actually come to your table).

Other illogical occurrences also plague the film.  Bill counterfeits some money, but then robs a bank and burns the money as a statement about the meaninglessness of money.  However, he also plants a bag of money (I suppose the counterfeit bills) on Evan as part of the setup.  Why did he counterfeit the money in the first place?  Why not just use the real money from the bank?  Also, we find out at the very end of the film that the clips of Bill in front of a white background are part of a manifesto, an explanation.  Why did he record himself explaining the rampage when he intended to pin it on Evan all along?  Is he just breaking the fourth wall?  If so, why didn’t he start earlier?

Movies should raise questions in their viewers minds, but those questions shouldn’t undermine the film.  Boll succeeds at the former, but fails at the later. 

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-11-07

  • @MichaelToole #NaNoWriMo is about practice and discipline, not getting published. #
  • Apparently Justin Bieber is at my school right now, which of course means there is now a whole lot of drama and excitement over nothing. #
  • On a more positive note, I just found out that the topic for my next and final course for my Masters is going to be Medieval Literature! #
  • @gmitx Canadian kid who sings like a girl. #
  • Al was awesome again, and the Austin crowd was much better than San Antonio crowd. (@ IHOP — Cesar Chavez / 35) http://4sq.com/d5x8uP #
  • The Big Bad Musical is now… Over. #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-10-24

  • So, apparently one of my Google accounts was accessed from China. Apologies if anyone got any obviously spam emails from me. #
  • But to what shall I compare this generation? It is like children sitting in the market places, who call out to the other children, and say: #
  • ‘We played the flute for you, and you did not dance; we sang a dirge, and you did not mourn.' #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-09-19

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-29

  • RT @engrishfunny United States of Britain? – Engrish Funny: Engrish Pictures That Is Your Funny En.. http://bit.ly/b9W3O1 #
  • Going to see Toy Story in 3d at IMAX. (@ Palladium Theater) http://4sq.com/dd7lPA #
  • So the film got stuck in Toy Story; they gave us free passes and are letting us see something else now. We picked The Last Exorcism. #
  • Scott Pilgrim was awesome and fun. #
  • Quick thoughts on Last Exorcism: some cliches, some cliches turned on their heads, lots of cool ideas, but not sure how I feel overall… #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-22

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-15

  • RT @thechoirtweet: The Choir Burning Like The Midnight Sun new cd reviewed in the Chicago Sun Times today http://tinyurl.com/29j9q9x #
  • My school year begins. (@ Hyatt Regency Hill Country Resort and Spa) http://4sq.com/8gYMAC #
  • After a two-hour long conference session I'm already worn out. At least I can ease into things. (@ Home) http://4sq.com/bOxoNX #
  • I just became the mayor of Home on @foursquare! http://4sq.com/bOxoNX #
  • Day 2: Why are so many trucks and SUVs parked in the Small Car lot? (@ Hyatt Regency Hill Country Resort and Spa) http://4sq.com/8gYMAC #
  • "It's not our job to prepare students for bad teachers." – Cool statement made in response to preparing kids for college. #
  • @CaliLewis squished in reply to CaliLewis #
  • I'm amazed by how long the graphite mark from stabbing myself in the hand with a pencil at least half a year ago can stick around. #
  • It's basically a tattoo: a very painful (at the time), meaningless, and uncool tattoo (though not as uncool as barbed wire). #
  • @rigby_eleanor Yeah… It'll be something to show my kids. :) in reply to rigby_eleanor #
  • Day 5 of new teacher training. (@ Robert G. Cole High Schol) http://4sq.com/9rZi34 #
  • @rigby_eleanor That's quite a lot. I've actually been pretty happy with the training I've been to; most of it's not just a rehash. in reply to rigby_eleanor #
  • It's Friday the 13th, which means two things: 1) My first week of work is over and 2) I got paid today. Moving to SA is paying off. #
  • @schezar Sounds like Lubbock, TX. Sometimes that town would just stink no matter where you went. in reply to schezar #
  • Hmmm… I'm thinking it's time to go through my old computer hardware to see what works. #

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-08

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-08-01

Powered by Twitter Tools

Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-07-25

  • Weird Al!!! (@ The Majestic Theatre w/ 9 others) http://4sq.com/5bgUw1 #
  • Having a traditional post-concert dinner at IHOP. (@ IHOP) http://4sq.com/8gNzgS #
  • Weird Al at The Majestic – Cell Phone encore.wmv http://youtu.be/4bPZWHSh4ng #
  • Hooray for fingerprinting! (Although I seriously hate people touching me that I don't know.) (@ Education Service Center, Region 20) #
  • Second try for Scott Pilgrim… (@ Barnes and Noble) http://4sq.com/5T4LrM #
  • I am full of fail RE: Scott Pilgrim… I could get it @borders, but will not for principle's sake. #
  • Getting ready to see Inception. #
  • Movies like Inception are why I still go to the theater. #

Powered by Twitter Tools